Alegres Corner The 300

"Always aim high, work hard, and care deeply about what you believe in. When you stumble, keep faith. When you're knocked down, get right back up. And NEVER listen to anyone who says you can't or shouldn't go on."
- Hillary Clinton -

(HOME)


Help Retire Hillary's Campaign Debt!


Please Support
Our Site

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
twitter.com/AlegresCorner

Watch the
CAUCUS FRAUD VIDEO

See Parts 2-4 Here

How Obama Rigged the Caucuses to Win the Nomination

THE BATTLE OF DENVER
Hillary's Delegates Fight to Get Her on The Ballot in Denver

Contact Us At
alegrescornerATyahooDOTcom


[mobile]

What's On Your Mind?

USEFUL LINKS
CLINTONS AT WORK
Clinton Foundation
State Dept. Interactive Tracker
State Dept. Blog
State Dept. Exchanges Connect
State Depat. video page
State Dept. Facebook
State Dept. Twitter
State Dept. Flickr

GROUPS
Campaign for Gender Equality
Coalition on Human Needs
NoLimits.org
Women's Media Center
Vital Voices
WomenCount.org

NEWS & MEDIA CONTACTS
AlertNet
Common Dreams
Media Matters
IPS News
Media Contact List
Real Clear Politics
RH Reality Check
U.N. Dispatch
Women's eNews
Women's Media Center
Write LTEs

Other Useful Sites
Lynette Long - Caucus Fraud Info
Top 30 Feminist Sites

Search




Advanced Search


ALEGRE'S CORNER
We're not finished folks - not by a long shot!

Bookmark and Share

NOW Says Single Payer Best Plan for Women

by: masslib

Thu Sep 10, 2009 at 15:12:38 PM EDT


NOW Urges Single-Payer as Best for Women; Says Reproductive Health Care Must Be Covered

Statement of NOW President Terry O'Neill

WASHINGTON - September 10 - President Barack Obama's address to Congress and the people of the United States resonates at a time when people are fed up with the health care status quo because it is not working. The National Organization for Women is pleased President Obama mentioned the need for a public option to provide health care to those not currently served by the profit-driven private insurance industry.

As activists, we also acknowledge that the steps he outlined fall short of a guarantee of comprehensive health care for all, including the full range of reproductive health services required to ensure equality for women. We must assert our human rights as the debates continue.

Women do need consumer protection against abuses by health insurers, particularly against so-called pre-existing conditions, which so often and outrageously have been applied to exclude pregnancy and maternal care.

Women also need expanded availability of insurance coverage. We have been traditionally underserved by employer-based health insurance because we are disproportionately represented in part-time paying jobs, often because of the vital yet unpaid and under-acknowledged caregiving services we provide for our families and country. Even when we work full-time, we are more often segregated into "pink collar" minimum-wage and non-union jobs -- that is, jobs that don't offer health care benefits.

Women also need health care costs to be reined in. Though we tend to be healthier than men, we often pay more for insurance premiums than men -- blatant sex discrimination -- a practice that must end immediately. In addition, we bear the brunt of skyrocketing drug costs, including birth control pills that are covered at the whims of profit-driven private health insurance companies.

NOW has long argued that single-payer health care is the best way to achieve the goal of universal, comprehensive and affordable care for everyone. We believe single-payer will give doctors and patients, not the government and not a profit-driven industry, the power to choose the best medical care for each patient. At minimum, any health care reform package must contain a strong public option, while also allowing states to create their own single-payer plans.

The health care debate has not been civil, and a member of Congress screaming at President Obama during his address last night served as a jarring reminder of that. It is with respect for the president's efforts to improve health care access that we must sound this alarm for women: We must hold our legislators accountable to ensuring the full range of reproductive services are a part of any health care plan. We will not tolerate the use and abuse of women's health care needs to achieve other political ends. Marginalizing women's health care marginalizes women as a class.

For far too long, family planning, pregnancy care and abortion have been marginalized as something "other" than basic health care, which NOW believes implicitly contributes to right-wing demonizing of abortion providers. Legislators continue to ban federal health care dollars from abortion, which directly opposes the will of the majority of the public that believes that abortion services should be covered in any health insurance reform plan.

Many nations recognize that providing coverage for abortion in health insurance, whether public or private, demonstrates that this kind of care is no different from any other health care service that women and men need to receive. Here in the United States, the public recognizes this as well. This should be the view that Congress embraces in the effort to pass health care reform. NOW calls upon legislators to remove all provisions in proposed legislation that would limit women's access to reproductive health care -- the voices insisting upon exclusion of abortion services will not vote for meaningful reform anyway, a reality many legislators have been reluctant to face.

NOW categorically rejects President Obama's promise to retain current "conscience refusal" laws, as stated last night. So-called conscience exemptions or refusals that allow health care providers -- physicians, nurses, clinics, pharmacies hospitals and even profit-driven insurance companies -- to refuse to provide any service that they claim offends their personal beliefs are untenable. Every woman in this country has a fundamental human right to the full range of reproductive health services, including a constitutional right to choose abortion.

In the final days of the George W. Bush administration, a sweeping "provider conscience" rule was adopted that has the potential to limit services for birth control, HIV/AIDS, abortion, sterilization and just about any procedure that an individual or entity opposes. The Obama administration began the regulatory change process in March to rescind this rule, and NOW calls upon the Obama administration to finish that job.

The National Organization for Women (NOW) is the largest organization of feminist activists in the United States. NOW has 500,000 contributing members and 550 chapters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
       
masslib :: NOW Says Single Payer Best Plan for Women
Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Caving to the right (4.00 / 2)
...is what's meant by moving beyond the partisan conflicts of the '90s. We're now transcending things like treating women equally under health reform.

Obama speaks with forked tongue... (0.00 / 0)
Oh yeah, he mentions the need for a public option, knowing full well that there will be no public option in the Senate bill.  If Obama's mouth is moving, he's lying, period.  Until we have single-payer coverage, there will continue to be people who fall through the cracks and are not covered. Obama is completely gutless for not insisting on single-payer from the beginning.  When he was campaigning for the U.S. Senate, he advocated for universal coverage.  After he got to D.C. and the insurance companies started lining his pockets with cash, he suddenly had a complete change of heart.  What a schmuck!!!

Having watched the speech last night, I could swear I heard Obama endorse a "pulbic option". (4.00 / 2)
So, how is it that all the democrats are "softening" on that, including Pelosi, as a result of the speech.  I must have not paid close enough attention.  I did hear that it hardened the republicans resolve to vote against a health care bill.  How does that lead the way to democrats further compromising to the point of not including the "public option"?  I just don't get it.  How can we possibly have elected all of these weak kneed democrats?

Wait, I know the reason. It's because they are more concerned with themselves and their political survival than they are with having morals and values. The reason is that they are more concerned with getting their asses elected back into congress in 2010, than they are about the people in this country.  And every talking head they listen to parrots the idea that if they don't pass a health care plan like they were elected to do, they will lose hundreds of thousands of seats in the next election.  How ironic that they are willing to pass a bill in name only, as though voters can't see right through what they are doing.  What jackasses.

We could improve things though.  We could replace all of the gang of 6 and then some with some worthwhile jackasses the next time around.    


He talked about a public option... (4.00 / 4)
he didn't talk up a public option.  When he outlined his plan he didn't mention it.  it came later in the "distortions" segment, at which point he took pains to say how meager it was.  He then said there were other ideas, nonprofits, regional option open in places like Alabama, triggers, etc.  He warned his progressive friends that Democrats driving force in health care reform has always been ending abuses of insurers, not government administered health coverage.  he had to bring up the public option or there would have been a riot, but I think he made it clear he's willing to or favorable of dropping it.

But really, this is all silly.  He blatantly lied when he said Medicare for All was "radical" and would "disrupt the system".  There is little truth to that.  Insurers are just the bill payers.  The feds already cover 47% of health care bills.  The "system" already fails to cover 50 million people.

We are about to commit billions of dollars to private insurers, and aside from investor portfolios, I have no idea why.  If he were serious about public options to cover the uninsured, how about offer them Medicare, say Medicare E, on a sliding scale?  

Medicare for All is Civil Rights


[ Parent ]
Ugh this is like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (4.00 / 1)
The minute they made Fannie, Freddie a "public-private partnership" they set them in a double-bind: corporations have a responsibility to maximize profits, but government programs have responsibility to serve people (common good, customers.)

[ Parent ]
Obama is like Bush (4.00 / 2)
...the truth is whistled between the lines. He was nuanced and vague about the public option - he didn't wave the red cape in front of the Netroots - but he did talk at some length about backing exchanges, a concept than is completely nonthreatening to insurers. So his marching orders, no doubt already understood by all the performers in this kabuki dance, is to present a bill with a harmless public plan administered by insurance companies within state exchanges.

[ Parent ]
Today somjeone told me that BO's plan... (4.00 / 1)
stinks, er, sorry, that was my brain getting control of my keyboard.

Anyway, today I was told that BO's plan covers everyone.  You see, you can buy insurance from private insurers and they have to cover you - if you have pre-existing conditions, it doesn't matter, they have to cover you.  So, that solves everyones' problems.

I.  Don't.  Think.  So.

We Americans are truly dumb.


[ Parent ]
How about if you don't have money to buy anything? (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
But but but....you must! (0.00 / 0)
It's mandated that you must buy insurance.  So.  Just.  Do.  It.

Doesn't matter how much they charge you - if they tell you how much you have to pay, you must.

Makes (no) sense to me.


[ Parent ]
I was multi-tasking during the speech, but I did hear the part about the public (4.00 / 2)
option, and I thought he gave it attention and supported it.  At least to the extent he is capable of, having no passion and no real interest in the entire issue.  I mean for Obama, it seemed like support.  Maybe I should have listened to the rest of the speech for context.

[ Parent ]
We should read the transcript (0.00 / 0)
instead of listening to him. Seriously.

[ Parent ]
How can he claim to be impassioned - he let Congress write it (4.00 / 1)
This is why it's so hard to buy that he cares about the details of what he's passing. He let congress draft it, and he gave them no directive.

Slapping a "reform" label on something and passing it is what he's impassioned about. He doesn't care what is inside of it.


[ Parent ]
What? The Face of Feminism..... (4.00 / 2)
is just out to screw us....again?

How can that be?


Throwing Women Overboard -- Again (4.00 / 1)
Martha Burk, a leading feminist as battered woman:

This is going to be a short -- but not too sweet -- message to the President.

Mr. President, in your speech to a joint session of Congress, you managed once again to gratuitously use women's rights to placate the right, assuring the nation that no public funds will be used to cover abortion in the new health care overhaul.

Dammit President Obama -- we support you. Women put you in office, and stuck with you when the crazies were beating you up with "death panels" and "socialized medicine."

We still support you, but like millions of women who were watching, we wonder why you have to always use our most intimate health issues as a bargaining chip to give away, when you're not going to get anything back. You did it at Notre Dame, and now you've done it again.



[ Parent ]
NO - we do not support Obama. (4.00 / 1)
Actually - this woman never did.  Never will!

[ Parent ]
Third Wave EPIC FAIL (4.00 / 1)
(Can you say)

[ Parent ]
ADULTS (4.00 / 1)
NOW, Fourth Wavers, PUMAs, Single Payer Advocates, Unapologetic, "absolutist" feminists = ADULTS


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Blog Roll

Adoxography
Anglachel
Bill Moyers Journal
Bitch Ph.D.
Black Agenda Report
BlogHer
Blogopenchangery
Blue Lyon
Bohemian Woman
By The Fault
Cannonfire
Crooks and Liars
The Confluence
Corrente
Daily Howler
Donna Darko
DoubleJointedFingers
eRiposte
Eschaton
Falstaff
Far Right Democrat
Feminist.com
Feministe
Firedoglake
Gene Lyons
Glenn Greenwald
Heidi Li's Potpourri
Historiann.com
Howling Latina
Hullabaloo
Hyper Educated Uppity Woman
Ian Walsh
InsightAnalytical
Jeff Dinelli
Jessica Valenti
Joe Conason
Lady Boomer NYC
Make Them Accountable
McClatchy DC
Media Matters County Fair
Michael Lind
Momsrising
No Limits
No Quarter
Not Your Sweetie
madamab's oooh, nuance!
Paul Krugman
Partizane
Peter Daou's Blog
PUMA / No We Won't Talk Radio
Pundit Mom
Reclusive Leftist
Red Hot and Blue Politics
Shakespeare's Sister
Suburban Guerilla
Tennessee Guerilla Woman
Talk Left
Texas Hill Country
The New Agenda
The Paper Tiger
Tom in Paine
Uppity Woman
The Widdershins
William J. Clinton Blog
Wampum


Foreign Policy

Peter Bergen
Steve Clemons
Democracy Arsenal
Joe Galloway
Heather Hurlburt
US Department of State
US Department of State blog


Powered by: SoapBlox