Alegres Corner The 300

"Always aim high, work hard, and care deeply about what you believe in. When you stumble, keep faith. When you're knocked down, get right back up. And NEVER listen to anyone who says you can't or shouldn't go on."
- Hillary Clinton -

(HOME)


Help Retire Hillary's Campaign Debt!


Please Support
Our Site

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
twitter.com/AlegresCorner

Watch the
CAUCUS FRAUD VIDEO

See Parts 2-4 Here

How Obama Rigged the Caucuses to Win the Nomination

THE BATTLE OF DENVER
Hillary's Delegates Fight to Get Her on The Ballot in Denver

Contact Us At
alegrescornerATyahooDOTcom


[mobile]

What's On Your Mind?

USEFUL LINKS
CLINTONS AT WORK
Clinton Foundation
State Dept. Interactive Tracker
State Dept. Blog
State Dept. Exchanges Connect
State Depat. video page
State Dept. Facebook
State Dept. Twitter
State Dept. Flickr

GROUPS
Campaign for Gender Equality
Coalition on Human Needs
NoLimits.org
Women's Media Center
Vital Voices
WomenCount.org

NEWS & MEDIA CONTACTS
AlertNet
Common Dreams
Media Matters
IPS News
Media Contact List
Real Clear Politics
RH Reality Check
U.N. Dispatch
Women's eNews
Women's Media Center
Write LTEs

Other Useful Sites
Lynette Long - Caucus Fraud Info
Top 30 Feminist Sites

Search




Advanced Search


ALEGRE'S CORNER
We're not finished folks - not by a long shot!

Bookmark and Share

Maine No on 1 Thread

by: Pacific John

Tue Nov 03, 2009 at 20:42:27 PM EST


Bangor News results. NYT link.

8:37 EST - With 3% in, we're losing:

REJECT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LAW
Yes 5336 54.68%
No 4422 45.32%

8:54 EST - with 5% in, we're up!:

No   14969   54.60%
Yes 12446 45.40%

9:38 EST - with 17% of precincts in, but evidently a higher pct of voters, it looks like it's going to be close:

No   37801   51.30%
Yes 35892 48.70%

9:50 EST - all the servers I'm watching are getting hammered. The Bangor Daily News seems to be reloading with obsolete numbers. "Open" "Left" is down a lot.

9:52 EST - with 22% of precincts in:

No   56659   50.62%
Yes 55267 49.38%

10:21 EST - Data insanity breaks out:

Unofficial Results sorted by race for 2009 November Election contested races updated at 10:21 PM on Tuesday, November 3, 2009. 172 of 605 (28 %) of precincts have been reported. 1016547 of 942825 (108%) registered voters have participated in this election. Election information provided by the Bangor Daily News.

Yes 74802 50.51%
No 73292 49.49%

10:41 EST The NYT has somewhat different, perhaps newer, results (yay!):

No -   97,182  51.0%  
Yes - 93,502 49.0

10:45 EST - ouch (NYT). Too bad we couldn't find a really big name Dem to help out, huh?:

37% reporting

Yes - 108,799 50.0%
No - 108,762 50.0

 

11:08 EST - 49% reporting. The WH said BHO's not watching the results. Sure. My bet is he's hoping like he's never hoped before that he didn't fuck this up with his lack of leadership.  

Yes - 142,916 50.4%
No - 140,783 49.6  
 

11:14 EST - oddly the top BHO blogs are pushing wishful data, not the usual hard projections about whose counties are in or not. They've gone down hill for some reason.

11:22 EST - 60% reporting. Have I mentioned that I can always count of Obama to let me down? I soooo want to be wrong about this guy on something important.

Yes - 182,360 51.6%
No - 171,171 48.4  

11:44 EST - not good. With close to 2/3 in, the spread is 3.6%. An identical replay of Prop. 8. Obama won Maine in the general election 58/40. A caucus state, he "won" it over Hillary 68/32.

Yes - 201,616 51.8%
No - 187,699 48.2
 

12:05 EST - 75% reporting

Yes - 227,360 52.1%
No - 208,743 47.9  

Ana Marie Cox tweets:

Things now looking even grimmer in Maine... 76% in, @nomtweets asshats up 52/47.8 (Thanks, Obama, for all the help!)

A short while ago, she re/tweeted:


RT @twpolk If Gays lose in ME by such tight margin, the blame will falls on DNC, OFA and Obama. // Sadly, I think they all know that.

I guess it's cold comfort that a netroots cw purveyor like Ana Marie sees things the same way the real world does.

Pacific John :: Maine No on 1 Thread
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Maine No on 1 Thread | 10 comments
My back of the envelope calculation (4.00 / 1)
says that turnout is higher than predicted.

Good luck -- we need this to go "YES!" (0.00 / 0)
I really hope, PJ, that the Maine voters will vote Yes.  I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

There's no excuse for this, DNC.  None.

Oops, I meant NO! (0.00 / 0)
I don't know how this initiative is written, PJ -- you do.  I want same-sex marriage to be legal in Maine in case there was any doubt.

There's no excuse for this, DNC.  None.

[ Parent ]
And that's what happens when I try to answer things too quickly. :-( (0.00 / 0)
At any rate, I want the folks to vote "NO!" -- or as the character Madea would say, "Hell to the NO!" ;)

There's no excuse for this, DNC.  None.

[ Parent ]
Wasn't she a Big O fan? (4.00 / 2)
Wasn't Cox a big Obama pusher before the election?  When the McClurkin incident should have told everyone everything they needed to know about him?

When somebody shows you who they are, pay attention.


Cox (4.00 / 1)
is addicted to cool.

[ Parent ]
From what I remember (4.00 / 1)
while she wasn't vociferous, I recall being relieved to see she was one of the few who was at least skeptical about Obama. At least during the primaries.

[ Parent ]
Quite frankly, (4.00 / 2)
why did it take Maine's elections to "wake up" the LGBT community about BO and his admin?  During the 2008 campaign BO never really supported the LGBT community, and the passing of Proposition 8 in California (where he robo-called in support of it) just put a point on it.  His hostile judicial positions on DOMA, DADT, etc. were also glaring signs of his dismissal of this community's fight for civil rights and equality before the law.

Some people fell in love with Obama (4.00 / 2)
and are slow to realize that he's a jerk.

On the CA robo-call, he wasn't behind the Yes on 8 robo-call, which was audio of his debate at Saddleback (iirc), but he didn't exactly set the record straight either.


[ Parent ]
Honestly, Trixta, I don't know. (4.00 / 1)
This was highly disappointing.  I just don't understand how this happened and would like to see a mandatory recount, especially with the "funny numbers" being reported earlier.  (Maybe that was a typo, maybe not.  But I'd like to see it recounted.)

As for Obama, he is a wimp.  At absolute best.  And he has no commitment to GLBT rights -- the more fool, he.

There's no excuse for this, DNC.  None.


[ Parent ]
Maine No on 1 Thread | 10 comments

Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Blog Roll

Adoxography
Anglachel
Bill Moyers Journal
Bitch Ph.D.
Black Agenda Report
BlogHer
Blogopenchangery
Blue Lyon
Bohemian Woman
By The Fault
Cannonfire
Crooks and Liars
The Confluence
Corrente
Daily Howler
Donna Darko
DoubleJointedFingers
eRiposte
Eschaton
Falstaff
Far Right Democrat
Feminist.com
Feministe
Firedoglake
Gene Lyons
Glenn Greenwald
Heidi Li's Potpourri
Historiann.com
Howling Latina
Hullabaloo
Hyper Educated Uppity Woman
Ian Walsh
InsightAnalytical
Jeff Dinelli
Jessica Valenti
Joe Conason
Lady Boomer NYC
Make Them Accountable
McClatchy DC
Media Matters County Fair
Michael Lind
Momsrising
No Limits
No Quarter
Not Your Sweetie
madamab's oooh, nuance!
Paul Krugman
Partizane
Peter Daou's Blog
PUMA / No We Won't Talk Radio
Pundit Mom
Reclusive Leftist
Red Hot and Blue Politics
Shakespeare's Sister
Suburban Guerilla
Tennessee Guerilla Woman
Talk Left
Texas Hill Country
The New Agenda
The Paper Tiger
Tom in Paine
Uppity Woman
The Widdershins
William J. Clinton Blog
Wampum


Foreign Policy

Peter Bergen
Steve Clemons
Democracy Arsenal
Joe Galloway
Heather Hurlburt
US Department of State
US Department of State blog


Powered by: SoapBlox