Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


Alegre's Corner
We're not finished folks - not by a long shot!

Are These Superdelegates for Sale?

by: Alegre

Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 10:49:45 AM EDT


Lynette Long pulled together the research behind that awesome video (hat-tip to Catfish for posting it yesterday), and she sent me her write-up on all this last night.  This is pretty damning stuff you guys.  Our CongressCritters are selling us out for a fistful of dollars and as far as BHO and his campaign are concerned, it's politics as usual here in DC.  He keeps talking about change but from what I've seen so far, nothing's changed and if he's elected - nothing will.

Lynette's research focused on four criteria regarding superdelegates in the House and Senate - 1. their states voted for Senator Clinton in the Democratic primary, 2. their districts voted for Clinton in the primary, 3.they accepted PAC money from Obama, and  4. they endorsed Obama.  Lynette's asked me to cross-post her research here.  Third parties have checked the information so it's solid.  

The question is folks - what are we going to do with it?

ARE SUPERDELEGATES FOR SALE?

In a few weeks the historic 2008 Democratic Party Presidential Primary between an African American Man and a White Woman will end.  The two candidates competed in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the US Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and Guam.  At the end of these contests, neither candidate had earned enough pledged delegates to garner the necessary 2118 needed to win the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.  Hillary Clinton earned 1640 pledged delegates while Barack Obama earned 1763 pledged delegates. A paltry 123 pledged separated the two candidates at the end of the primary season.  Since there was no clear winner, the superdelegates would determine the Democratic nominee.

Alegre :: Are These Superdelegates for Sale?
Approximately 800 superdelegates will make up around 20% of the 4000 delegates at the convention.   These superdelegates are Democratic Party leaders, Democratic governors, and Democratic members of congress.  They have the right to endorse either candidate without reason and can change their endorsement from one candidate to another at any time.  The superdelegates are very powerful and highly sought after by candidates.  One superdelegate is equal to one pledged delegate or 11,361 voters in California or  7,220 voters in New York.  Many factors influence which candidate a superdelegate  a superdelegate endorses but they usually vote the way their constituents vote.   Some superdelegates have intense personal relationships with particular candidates that may influence their endorsement.  Members of congress may also be influenced by money given or promised by party leaders, the DNC or the candidates themselves.

Politicians collect money for their campaigns but most American's don't realize that politicians collect a separate a pot of money called a Leadership Political Action Committee or PAC.  These PACs are used to hire additional staff and pay for additional perks such as limos and first class flights.  But one of the major reasons for these PAC's is to donate to the campaigns of other candidates.  Nancy Pelosi's PAC is called  PAC to the Future, Barack Obama's PAC is called Hope Fund, and Hillary  Clinton's PAC is called Hillpac.  Money was distributed by these PAC's to the superdelegates to influence their voting.  The Federal Elections Commission requires scrupulous reporting of how PAC money is obtained and how it is spent.  This data can be retrieved at www.opensecrets.org.

In 2007, Obama distributed 299,000 from his PAC to superdelegates.  He especially targeted the states of Iowa and New Hampshire.    On July 25, 2007, the Hope Fund made $1000 donations to each of the following groups: Hillsborough=2 0County Democrats, Hudson, NH; Martha Fuller Clark for State Senate, Portsmouth, NH; Merrimack County Democrats, Chichester, NH; New Hampshire for John Lynch, Manchester, NH; Sgambati 4 NH Senate, Tilton, NH; Stafford County Democratic Committee, Durham, NH and Sullivan County Democrats, Claremont, NH.  Obama also gave $5000 contributions to New Hampshire Democratic Party, Concord, New Hampshire, on July 26,2007; New Hampshire for John Lynch on July 25, 2007, and New Hampshire Democratic State Committee, Concord, New Hampshire on November 3, 2006.   Obama did not announce his candidacy until May 2, 2007.    

Obama also gave New Hampshire Democratic State Senator Jacalyn Cilley $1000 on July 25, 2007.  She endorsed Obama on July 31, 2007, just six days after his contribution to her campaign.  On July 26, 2007, first term New Hampshire Congressman Paul Hodes of New Hampshire endorsed Obama.  The New Hampshire Primary was not until January 8, 2008 and Hillary won New Hampshire.  

By March 28, 2008, Hope Fund donated $710,900 to superdelegates, more than three times as much as Hillpac. ($236,100).  A study by the Center for Responsive Politics showed that presidential candidates who gave more money to a superdelegate received their endorsement 82% of the time. This is especially disturbing when the superdelegates endorse a candidate that is decidedly contrary to the will of the voters in their state and their districts.

After reviewing state and congressional voting records as well as PAC donations, members of congress were identified that fulfilled the following four criteria:  1. These members endorsed Barack Obama.  2. The constituents of their state preferred Hillary Clinton.  3. The constituents of their district preferred Hillary Clinton. 4. They got more PAC money from Hope Fund than from HillPac.  These senators are Jeff Bingaman, Frank Lautenberg, and Jay Rockefeller.  The members of the house are Jason Altmire, Dennis Cardoza,  Jim Costa, Joe Donelly, Gabrielle Giffords, Baron Hill, Ron Klein, Patrick Murphy, Gerald Mc Nerney, Carol She-Porter, Zack Space, Niki Tsongas, and  Charlie Wilson.  

Charlie Wilson is the perfect example. He ran in Ohio's District 6 in 2006.   His seat was the seat of the former governor and is located in Southern Ohio.  Wilson was a last minute candidate for his seat and because of this was a write-in candidate.  The governor and the party worked hard to get Wilson elected.   President Clinton made an audio recording endorsing Wilson that went out to 50,000 homes.   The governor of Ohio is a big Clinton supporter, the voters of Ohio voted 54-44% percent in favor of Clinton, and District 6, Wilson's District, voted for Clinton 70% - 27%.  Yet Wilson endorsed Obama.  It looks like there is no loyalty in politics to either your constituents or your friends.  Wilson got $7,000 of PAC money from Barack Obama, but no money from Hillary Clinton.  Was this a factor in his choice?  

The following chart summaries the data culled from a variety of sources.  The data raises obvious questions about the inherent power of superdelegates and their vulnerability to financial contributions.  Contributions from other Pacs such as Pac to the Future need to be reviewed.

Dr. Lynette Long is a writer and the author of 20 books including 14 math books. She has published dozens of articles in trade and professional journals.  She has appeared on hundreds of radio and television programs.  Her blog is http://www.lynettelong.com.  You can contact her at DrLynetteLong@aol.com.

A lot of these folks have gotten help from Bill and Hillary over the years, and yet they've sold out the Clintons and their own constituents in this election.  Now that the information's out there - how are we going to convince them to do the right thing and back Hillary?

If these folks represent you in Congress please call them and ask (respectfully) that they not sell their vote to the highest bidder, and represent you at our party's convention.  You can reach them in their DC office by calling the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Unfortunately, the most effective way to gain the attention of both (0.00 / 0)
voters and the SDs who voted against their constituents is local ads. I say "unfortunately" because these ads take time and effort to prepare and they cost money. If this information had been made available early in June, we might have had time to do some fundraising and organization to get ads out in the local papers. Public humiliation tends to work wonders with these politicians when just about nothing else does. Angry phone calls to the politician can be hidden from the public, so calls from constituents are not enough. Our current system is totally corrupt and only prolonged public exposure to what is really happening is likely to result in any type of change.

These stats would make GREAT ads! (0.00 / 0)
Especially if Bam-bam's poll numbers dip before election day.

They'll make good RNC ads in general.  


[ Parent ]
Good stuff. Damning spreadsheet. (0.00 / 0)
Nice work!

The voters voted but money talks (0.00 / 0)
This is sad. Just the money involved in all the campaigns is proof the "Money is the root of all evil."

Guess we all have a price- Hey Obama if you pay for my heat and prescriptions and medical bills for the next 4 years I'll vote for you too...  (NOT!) but I am forced to at least consider it, thank you congress and America ...


Cheap Dates (0.00 / 0)
BHO didn't even have to spend a lot on them to get them to give up their votes (or sell out their constituents) either.

AT least not by DC standards anyway.

Invest in Women - Change the World
http://twitter.com/alegrescorner


[ Parent ]
Yes, I noticed some sold out for 10k (0.00 / 0)
But the voters were higher for Hillary in everyone of those examples. I know Bill and Hillary have to be seething underneath this whole mess and I wish we could be privvy to why the Democratic Party did this. Part of me does understand, to grow the AA and young voter lists, but it still reeks.

If America wasn't in such dire straits (thanks to Bushco et al) maybe I could play along but I can't.


[ Parent ]
Excellent research, terrific chart! (0.00 / 0)
I agree with the idea upthread that local action is needed. Could we write letters to regional newspapers, or call in to local radio stations?  A lot of hard work went into that chart, it shouldn't go to waste.  

Still Hearting Hillary, In Slo-Mo toward McCain

LTEs to Local Papers (0.00 / 0)
At this point I think our best bet is to fire off as many LTEs to the newspapers in their districts as we can.

The DNC has a tool you can use - just plug in a zip code and it brings up the press and media outlets for that area.

Invest in Women - Change the World
http://twitter.com/alegrescorner


[ Parent ]
Grayslady's got a good idea (0.00 / 0)
How do we spread the word.

It's free advertising, copy and send.


These Greedy B@st@ards (0.00 / 0)
will saddle the Democratic party with a loser and not even bat an eye.  All they care about are their own seats.

The Price Of An Obama Delegate (0.00 / 0)
just went up.  $20 million, according to McClatchey here:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/hom...

Note that the story says the superdelegate lost his seat on the state DNC for offering to trade/sell his vote but won't have to leave that seat till after the convention.


"Always aim high, work hard, and care deeply about what you believe in. When you stumble, keep faith. When you?re knocked down, get right back up. And NEVER listen to anyone who says you can't or shouldn't go on."
Hillary Clinton - June 7, 2008

Hillary Clinton
- Put stuff here

Blog Roll
- Put stuff here

Powered by: SoapBlox